Vessels full of living waters

Introduction

Ritual/Ritualism

The religious leaders of Jesus' day imposed upon the people a mind-boggling accretion of rabbinical traditions and ritualistic practices. Good practicing Jews had to scrupulously wash cups, pots, and copper kettles. They had to carefully purify their hands when they came in from the market  (Mk7:1-5). Above all, they had to observe the many countless prescriptions and rituals laid down for observing the Sabbath.  How often Jesus has run-ins with the Scribes and Pharisees  for not observing the Sabbath  (Lk 6:1-5; Lk 13:11-14;  Lk 14:1-6).

 

This confusing maze of prescriptions and rituals was a heavy burden on people's backs, and Jesus tried to  comfort them saying, "Come to me all you who are weary and heavily burdened, and I shall give you rest"  (Mt 11:28-30). He meant rest especially from religion as burden. He meant rest especially from empty ritualism.

 

Jesus was not against ritual itself. After all, at the Last Supper  he was engaged in ritual as, "he took the bread, gave thanks to God, broke it, and gave it to the Apostles saying, `This is my body given for you; do this in memory of me'”(Lk 22: 19- 20).   The Eucharist, the mass, the liturgy is ritual. Jesus is not against ritual itself but  against  ritualism: that’s ritual which, like cracked vessels, carries no living waters.

 

Or to put it positively, Jesus is for good ritual, that's ritual which, like good un-cracked  vessels, teems  with living waters.  That’s the kind of ritual which Rabbi Abraham Heschel describes when he writes that, “Down through the centuries the Sabbaths, with all their ritual, were great cathedrals for Jews, teeming with inner strength for them and helping them to know who they are.”

Sex as  ritual

 

 Someone has said that ritual is the "motion-al” language of religion. That is to say, ritual is religion speaking not with words but with  movement and gesture." I like the definition  but it needs some clarification.  In his book Philemon's Problem,  Fr. Burtchaell,  Notre Dame theologian, offers an example: A  man, he says,  loves his wife when he senses without being told that she is not feeling well, and he ministers to her. He loves her when he is attentive to chores without being nagged. He loves his wife when he pitches in and cares for the children when they are down with fever. Yes, he writes, he loves  his wife even as he wipes the ring out of the bathtub. Then Fr. Burtchaell  writes: "It is not in bed that he makes love to his wife. He does that when he wipes the ring out of the tub. It is in bed that he celebrates the love that has grown between them as he keeps wiping the ring out of the tub."

 

In other words, sex is ritual, i.e. it is “speaking not with words but with movement and gesture." Sex as ritual is taking time out from daily life to celebrate the loves that has been growing between two human beings. But if no love has been growing between the two, if, furthermore, their love is waning or even turning into anger or hate, then sex  is empty ritualism, a cracked vessel containing no living waters.

 

A truth at work

There is at work here a truth that might surprise most of us; it is this:  What makes us truly Christian and truly religious does not happen  here in church and in ritual, but out there in real life. For example,  all  real and costly neighborliness don’t happen in here at  Mass during the  Kiss of Peace but “out there” somewhere in real life. Scripture says, "If you remember that someone has something against you, leave your gift at the altar, go and be reconciled with that person, and then come back and offer your gift," then  come back and shake hands (Mt 5:23-24).

 

The Kiss of Peace is not the reality; it is the ritual. As ritual, it is  taking time out to celebrate in here the forgiveness or neighborliness that has happened out there.  But if no neighborliness has happened out there, if, furthermore, we've become steeped in revenge or just don't give a hoot about one another,  then  the Kiss of Peace is empty ritualism, a cracked vessel containing no living waters.

 

Eucharist as  ritual

(bad ritual)

We make the same point today, on this feast of Corpus Christi ( on this feast of the Body and the Blood of the Lord.) All  true and costly  bread-breaking takes place not here in church and in ritual  but out there in real life.  The Eucharist, the Mass, the liturgy is not the reality; it is the ritual. It's taking time out  to celebrate all the bread-breaking that has happened “out there” somewhere. But if no bread-breaking or sharing has taken place “out there;” if, furthermore, we have selfishly been grabbing things for ourselves, and have not been thinking of others but only ourselves,  then the Eucharist becomes empty ritualism, a cracked vessel containing no living waters.

 

Sometime ago I stopped in at Caputo's in Chicago, an ethnic Italian food store, to stock up on the "good stuff." Nothing neat and orderly about the place; nothing packaged or processed about it; nothing antiseptic about it, as in the case of our super-markets are. Just huge heaps of honest-to-God produce piled everywhere. There huge crowds don't mind bumping into each other. After gathering a number of items, I lined up at the check out counter.  Ahead of me was an Italian, I presumed. He had a huge mountain of stuff to be checked out. You need a lot of money to buy so much of that good stuff, and he looked as though he had it. But between him and me (next in line after him to be checked out) stood a woman, and she had one sole item in her hand, one sole item, I tell you: a bag of Greek coffee beans. Her husband is Greek, she tells me. I say to myself, I wonder, I wonder, I wonder what this guy is going to do?

 

And he does what I fear he is going to do: he proceeds to check out his mountain of goodies before her one solitary  bag of beans! And seven minutes later it's her turn to check out the coffee beans, and that consumes seven seconds. We might laugh but the bottom line is, "How immoral can you get!" Yes, I say it again, "How immoral can you get!"  Either this guy saw the woman or he didn't see her. If he did see her, how come his morality didn't say to her, "Come on, honey, you're before me (that's how we make it a compassionate and loving world)? Come on, little lady, you're before me." If he did not see her (she's right beside him) he's blind. Having the financial power to buy all the things you want can make you blind, unable to see anybody else but yourself. No one caught that gross act of immorality. If it had been adultery, everyone would have caught it.

 

The point: I assumed he  bore a good Italian name and was a good Roman   Catholic. But   I was also tempted to assume that his Sunday Mass is an empty vessel carrying no living waters, so lacking was he in bread-breaking “out there” at the check-out counter.  

 

(good ritual)

But let me tell you another story about something that happened “out there” at the check-out counter. But this story  is about a beautiful vessel filled to the brim with living waters. I believe I have already told you the story, but  good stories are  for  repeating. (My gosh, we tell the Christmas story over and over again. I’ve heard the Christmas story seventy-five times now, and it never bores me.) A few years ago I had to put my dog, Tina, to sleep.  Only dog-lovers know the grief involved. Some days later  I had to shop for groceries at the old "Pick and Save"  on East Capitol. It was very early in the morning. After gathering the food I had not taste for, I noticed  there was only one clerk at the check-out counter. I  know the guy fairly well and so do many others, precisely because he is a beautiful human being. But being in a rather weepy mood, I really didn't want to go to him, because he's the kind of guy who says to you, "Hey, how are you and Tina doing?" Well, he did just that!

 

When I broke the news, he immediately read my grief. Suddenly he reached for his wallet, opened the cash register, did some transaction, and then returned the wallet to his pocket.  I really didn't know what he was doing. When  I handed  him my money, he rejected it saying,  "I've taken care of it."  And then he gave me the check-out receipt. This young man is black. I mention  color because it is really part of the story.  Here is a blue-collar worker who has to dress in a white shirt but  doesn't make one hundred  dollars an hour, and he is paying for my groceries!

 

Now that indeed is bread-breaking par excellence “out there” at a check-out counter.  That indeed is eucharisting of the very first water. And  if this Baptist man were to come “in here” and partake of our Catholic communion that indeed would be ritual of the very first class.  No cracked and empty clay jar here but rather one big beautiful earthen vessel overflowing with living waters.

 

Conclusion

(Bread broken and shared)

In the old days on the feast of Corpus Christi, we used to place the sacred Host, the consecrated bread, into the monstrance, to be carried around in procession and to be gazed upon. We don't do that so much today anymore. In fact, we're all aware there's  a different atmosphere today.  The concentration now is not so much upon Jesus in the bread (period) but rather upon Jesus in  the  breaking of the bread. That fits well with Scripture. Luke tells us that on Easter morning when the Apostles were on the road to Emmaus, Jesus caught up to them and spoke with them, but it was only after they broke bread together that the Apostles recognized that it was Jesus  (Lk 24:30-31). Jesus  --  not simply in the bread but rather in the breaking of the bread.  The difference, I think, is significant.

 

At the consecration and elevation of the eucharistic bread what we gaze upon is not simply bread but rather bread broken and shared. Raised on high the Eucharist calls to mind and celebrates all the bread-breaking we’ve done “out there” before we've come “in here” for mass. And the dismissal at the end of mass is this: “By the strength and inspiration of this liturgy and ritual go forth now to break even more and better bread.”