Gaudete

 

Introduction

Gaudete

Remember we said that Advent is divided into a first part and a second part.  The first part  gazes into the future when Christ will come again in glory.  The second part begins on the 17th of December (that’s today) with the beginning of the Novena for Christmas.  The look now is backward into the past, to that moment of history when   Jesus was born in Bethlehem. If the 17th were not a Sunday but a week-day, the gospel reading would be that long male-ridden genealogy of Jesus from Matthew  in which Abraham begets Isaac and Isaac begets  Jacob and Jacob begets Judah, etc., etc. It runs through forty-two generations,  and nobody today has the courage to read it at liturgy  in  its entirety. The genealogy finally arrives at  “Joseph, the husband of Mary, and it was of her that the Christ was born” (Mt 1:1-7).

 

Today is not only the beginning of the novena for Christmas, it is also  third Sunday of Advent.  The third Sunday has always been called Gaudete Sunday,  because half-way through Advent the Church   gives us a command to rejoice (“Gaudete,” the opening word from the old Latin Mass  for the third Sunday of Advent,  means “rejoice.”) That rejoice-command was more welcomed in the old days than it is now, because Advent used to be a penitential season. Then Gaudete seemed to be saying to us, “Hey, rejoice, we’re half-way through Advent!” 

 

The Church  issues a rejoice-command also during  Lent but there she uses a    different Latin word for rejoice: Laetare.  So that Sunday is called Laetare Sunday. And it too is issued half-way through Lent. And Lent still being the  penitential season it always was,  the rejoice-command is  welcomed for it means we’re half-way through  our journey   to Easter and to Spring.

 

Unpsychological but scriptural

In Latin grammar, gaudete and laetare are in the imperative mood, not the volitive  mood. The volitive mood would translate, "Be so kind as to rejoice, please." The imperative mood is a good healthy command: "Rejoice!" Period. But in this great age of psychology  we don't like people commanding our internal states.  If I want to go around grouching "Bah humbug!" like old Scrooge, then that's what I'm going to do, and don't tell me to rejoice. Some of us don't like bumper stickers that order us to smile because "God loves you" (even though the guy sporting the sticker might not).

 

You just don't go around commanding people to rejoice or to be happy or to smile. Oh, but Scripture does. Look at the gaudete scriptures for this third Sunday of Advent. In the first reading, the prophet Zephaniah, addressing refugees in a slum district of Jerusalem, issues them a command to,  "Shout for joy, O daughter Zion! sing joyfully, O Israel.... The Lord, your God, is in your midst..." (3:14‑18a).   In the second reading, Paul, mind you, is sitting in prison and bound with chains, and yet is crying out, "Gaudete! Rejoice in the Lord always." He's even repeats himself: "Iterum, dico, gaudete. Again I say, rejoice! The Lord is near" (Phil 4:4‑7).

 

It is possible…

I am reminded of the German Jesuit, Father Delp, who was executed by Hitler on the second of February, 1945. In a book entitled The Prison meditations of Fr. Delp, we find this diary entry for  Gaudete Sunday:  “Is happiness possible in a prison cell, a space covered by three paces  in each direction, one’s hands fettered, one’s heart filled with longings, one’s head full of problems and worries? Is happiness possible here?” He answers, “Yes, it can happen even under these circumstances. I tell you, every now and then my heart can scarcely contain the delirious joy that's in it. Suddenly, not knowing why, my spirits soar again and there is no doubt in my mind that all the divine promises hold good." He admits that this might just be an unconscious defense mechanism against depression. "But not always," he writes. "Sometimes it is due to a premonition of great good tidings.”

 

Despite Hitler’s war and his prison chains,  the divine promises still hold good for him: " One nation shall not raise the sword against another, nor shall they train for war anymore” (Is 2:4-5). Despite all the ruin and rubble around him,  the  divine promises still hold good: there will be a  new heaven and earth, and a new city of Jerusalem (Rv 21:1).  Despite his very stark and sober circumstances, the divine promises still hold good:  the best wine is being saved for last (Jn 2:10). Despite all the tears he shed in prison and despite his impending execution,  the divine promises hold good: “God shall wipe away all tears from their  eyes,  and there will be no more crying and no more dying” (Rev 7:17; 21:4).

 

How is it possible….

How is it possible for Fr. Delp to rejoice in a prison cell, “a space covered by three paces  in each direction”? How is it possible  for us to rejoice, if we have just  received  a very chilling verdict from the doctor? How is it possible for us to rejoice if we have lost a spouse of 30, 40, 50 years, or if our life  or the life of someone we love very much has been plunged into  inconsolable grief by some senseless tragedy? How can we possibly rejoice when we have lost a pet “of human estate” who showed us, like no human being ever showed us, what God’s unconditional love of us looks like?  How can we possibly rejoice in the face of all those other losses which have the taste of death about them  and which pepper our human lives along the way: loss of limb, loss of job, loss of friendship, loss of reputation? How is it possible?

 

A mood and a decision

Psychiatry has part of the answer: It is possible because joy  is not just a mood which is at the pure mercy of the right circumstances of life.  Joy is  also a decision or choice ‑‑ a decision not to get stuck in our sorrow and pain but to rise above them.  To use the climate of December,  it is a decision not to be snowbound by the grieves, the losses, the misfortunes of life, but to shovel out and get on top of it all. Joy: not just a mood  at the mercy of life but also a decision.

 

The mystery at the cross-road

But psychiatry does not have the whole answer. There is also a mysterious inexplicable element involved here. Somewhere along the way, very  very early in life (they tell us everything  is signed, sealed, and delivered by then),  we  come to a cross-road, and there we make a basic decision for our life  --  a decision to head out into one or the other direction. That cross-road-moment might be very undramatic, almost unnoticed, but it is very critical and decisive. //There at the cross-road (to use the imagery of  Charles Dicken’s)   we make a basic decision  either  to sing out “Merry Christmas” like the nephew in A Christmas Carol, or to grouch out “Bab Humbug”  like old Ebenezer  Scrooge.   //There at the cross-road (to use the climate of the moment) we make a  basic decision to  either be snowbound by the sorrow and grief of life, or to dig out and get on top of it all. //There at the cross-road we make a decision either to  wiggle and wallow in self-pity  or to  rise above our sorrow and pain, and break through the snowdrift on top of us, like daffodils in early spring, and get on with life and  bloom wherever we are.

 

Now the mysterious inexplicable element is this: How come one person will make a decision to go into one direction, and another person, in basically the same circumstances, will decide to  go off into  the other direction? How come one person will make a basic choice for joy in life while another person will not?  How come one person will choose to sing out “Merry Christmas” while another will choose to grouch out “Bah Humbug” in life?  How come Scrooge (that “ squeezing, wrenching, grasping, clutching, covetous old sinner”), who has all the money he needs,  chooses to grouch out “Bah Humbug,” while  his nephew, who has almost nothing at all, chooses  to sing out “Merry Christmas!“  Recall what Scrooge shouted back at him? “What reason have you to be merry? You’re poor enough.”  To which the young man replies, “What reason have you to be morose? You’re rich enough?” The decision made  at the crossroad is mysterious and inexplicable. It is also critical. There at the crossroad we are fixed in our decision. That’s the way it is going to be for us for the rest of our lives. People don’t change.

 

 

Conclusion

Though old  Scrooge perhap0s never made a decision against joy (people just don’t do that; it’s psychologically impossible), he surely didn’t make a decision for joy, and that itself was a decision. And he was fixed in that decision. When the curtain goes up on A Christmas Carol, there’s old Scrooge fixed in his “Bah Humbug.”  But when  the curtain comes down, there is a new Scrooge on the stage. He has been  changed by something “ghostly.” He has been changed  by the three Spirits of Christmas. He has been changed  by some  divine visitation  that intervenes, and works the miracle that it takes to change him. When the curtain comes down, the new Scrooge is “gaudete-ing.” He is rejoicing. He is shouting out, “Merry Christmas.” And he promising the whole world that he will keep Christmas in his heart the whole year though. And the new Scrooge is proof positive, for all of us who need it,  that with some help from above  we aren’t fixed and we can change.