Broken Bread

Introduction

Corpus Christi--well positioned

In his ascension to the right hand of the Father, Jesus promised he would not leave us orphans but would be with us to the end of time (Jn 14:14; Mt 18:20).  He kept his promise by sending us his Holy Spirit. We celebrated that last Sunday with the feast of Pentecost. He has also kept his promise to be with us always by giving us the Eucharist. We celebrate that today with the feast of the Solemnity of the Body and Blood of Christ. In days past we called it the feast of Corpus Christi.

 

With a bit of nostalgia some of us remember how we used to celebrate Corpus Christi. It was a big event and, indeed, a big production.  The Blessed Sacrament was placed in a very elaborate gold-gilded monstrance. Then under a portable canopy the celebrant carried the Eucharist in procession through villages in valleys and hamlets on hills, amidst clouds of incense and over carpets of flowers. At three outdoor altars the procession stopped to bless the crowds with the Blessed Sacrament. The feast is no longer  the big production it used to be, though the missalette calls it “The Solemnity of the Body and Blood of the Lord.”

 

The journey out of our Eucharistic past

Since Vatican II we’ve made a journey of a light-year out of our Eucharistic past.  For example, in the old days when it came time for Communion, only twenty to thirty people out of a packed congregation would rise to take Communion. Only those who had gone to confession and considered themselves in the state of sanctifying grace (something you turned off and on like a switch) rose to communicate.  The rest of the faithful, who considered themselves in the state of mortal sin, remained nailed to their pews. That has changed dramatically.  Now a whole congregation of sinners rises to communicate. That new practice resonates better, it seems, with the words of Jesus who said, “I have come not for the righteous but for the sinner” (Mt 9: 13). It resonates better with the conduct of Jesus who was always being criticized for eating and drinking with tax collectors and sinners (Lk 5: 30). Communion now is not a reward for holiness but is food for the journey of weak human beings.

 

In the past we were warned about making bad confessions and bad Communions. A bad confession was hiding some sin in the confessional or not confessing it correctly. A bad Communion was going to Communion with a mortal sin on your soul and not confessing it first. You don’t hear much talk about that anymore except on EWTN, and I always keep forgetting that the younger generation has no idea what we’re talking about.

 

In the past we were scrupulous about touching the Eucharist. Only the consecrated hands of an ordained male could touch the Blessed Sacrament.  Now the faithful receive Communion in the hand.  Now lay men and women are ministers of the Eucharist. Now the faithful after Sunday Mass carry Communion in pixes to loved ones sick at home. Now also we hear the rumblings of a great debate that’s trying to get off the ground and just won’t go away, especially as the shortage of priests gets more acute by the day. It’s the debate about the ordination of married men and even of the ordination of women to celebrate the Eucharist.

 

Since Vatican II we’ve made a journey of a light-year out of our Eucharistic past.  Almost everything has changed except one thing: the Eucharist remains central to Catholic faith. We come fifty-two times a year to celebrate it. As a priest of a good fifty years who has made that journey of a light-year out of our Eucharistic past, I have my own insight and characterization of that remarkable and never-imagined change. It is this: in the past we emphasized Jesus’ presence in the bread. In the new day we emphasize Jesus’ presence in the breaking of the bread.  That’s much more than just semantics.

 

 

In the bread

In the past we recognized Jesus in the bread. So we gazed upon the bread held on high at the elevation of the Mass, and we even rang a bell then to make sure that everyone was gazing on Jesus present in the bread. In those days Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament was a great favorite. The priest would take the Host out of the dark tabernacle and insert it into the monstrance which he’d place high upon the altar so that all might gaze upon Jesus present in the bread. There was a kind of salvation in all that, just as  there was when Moses lifted up the bronze snake on a pole in the desert, and all who looked upon it were saved (Jn 3:14).

 

In the breaking of the bread

In the new day the emphasis is on Jesus’ presence in the breaking of the bread.  That’s scriptural. On Easter morning as two of the disciples are walking and talking on the road from Jerusalem to Emmaus, the risen Lord draws near and asks them what the discussion is all about. As they relate to him all the great events that have just happened, they don’t recognize that it is the risen Lord. Drawing near to Emmaus, they invite him, saying, “Sir, it’s getting dusk, why don’t you come and stay with us?” He stays, and at supper he takes bread and says the blessing. When he breaks the bread and gives it to them, their eyes are opened, and they recognize him in the breaking of the bread (Lk 24: 13-31).

 

A rubric broken

Remember the lady from out of town who happened to stumble into the 10 A.M. Sunday Mass here at Old St. Mary’s, not knowing what she was getting into? She was aghast at a great number of aberrations.  She later wrote back a whole litany of complaints. One of them was: “You broke the bread at the time of consecration and not later on when you’re supposed to.”

 

I basically follow the rubrics laid down for the celebration of Mass. They’re important because they moderate the celebrant’s person so that he doesn’t become a loose canon at Mass, celebrating himself instead of the Mass.  But I’m not a die-hard rubricist. The celebrant is more than just a liturgical automaton.  I depart a bit at the consecration. It’s then that I break the host while obedient priests break it later on when they’re supposed to. The breaking of the bread at the consecration and then holding the broken bread on high dramatizes for me, at least, what it’s all about: we come here weekly to break bread and share it and to recognize the Lord in it.

 

Bread not broken and shared at a funeral

When bread is not really broken and shared at Mass, then there’s no recognizing the Lord.  Not too long ago I concelebrated at the funeral Mass of a very dear friend who died in the operation room as his wife and I were anxiously waiting outside. I participated at the funeral Mass, not as the chief priest but as the homilist. Everything went off well enough until Communion time. Then something happened which jarred and marred and almost invalidated everything, at least for me. The chief priest said, “Catholics may now come up and receive Holy Communion!” What in the world could those words possibly mean? Catholics know when it is time to come up and receive Communion.  His words could only mean, “The rest of you are excluded!” For me that quite soundly invalidated the sweet bread of Communion and turned it into the bitter bread of exclusion. The Lord was to be recognized in the breaking of the bread, and at the last moment the blessed breaking of bread was called off, and there was no Lord to be recognized.

 

Bread broken and shared at Old St. Mary’s

A blessed bread-breaking took place here at Old St. Mary’s a few weeks ago. When Margaret Butter, a well-known lady here in Milwaukee and wife of Roy Butter a parishioner of Old St. Mary’s, died, her daughter-in-law, the Rev. Sarah Sarchet Butter (an ordained Presbyterian minister)  and I officiated at Margaret’s funeral in a cemetery chapel. Rev. Sarah did the first reading from the Book of Proverbs which sings the praises of a woman who is a good mother, wife, and manager of her household. She read with great clarity and much feeling. At the final commendation the Rev. Sarah invited the crowd in the cemetery to draw near to the casket which was being kissed by a consoling sun on a day filled with the feel of fall. She pulled everyone into a heartfelt final good-bye. A few Sundays ago the Rev. Sarah was here at mass with her husband, daughter and father-in-law. Thank God that the chief priest at the Mass didn’t say, “Catholics may now come up and receive Communion.” All felt invited and all came up. Bread was broken between Presbyterians and Catholics, and in the breaking of the bread both of us recognized the Lord.

Bread broken and shared at Plymouth Congregational

A few years ago when our Archdiocese was in a crisis and we were all in deep pain, our spirits were lifted up every now and then by reports of great magnanimity which balanced off the depressing mean-spiritedness of some in those day. I was particularly inspired by the Rev. Mary Ann Neevel, formerly pastor of the Plymouth Congregational Church here in Milwaukee. She stood beside Archbishop Weakland, as Mary stood beside the wounded Jesus. In a homily to her congregation she magnanimously declared, “We are all in this together.” That was bread-breaking at its best, and in it  we recognized the Lord.

 

The old Baltimore Catechism taught that to be a fit candidate for the priesthood (a) one must be a baptized Catholic, (b) one must be a male and unmarried, (c) one must be ordained. The most important element of all is missing: to be a worthy candidate for the priesthood and celebrant of the Eucharist one must be a good breaker of bread. The Rev. Sarah Sarchet Butter and the Rev. Mary Ann Neevel are great bread-breakers, and that would make them worthy celebrants of the Eucharist.

The present scandal

The bottom line is whoever knows how to break bread well, whether married or unmarried, whether male or female, should for that reason especially be considered a worthy candidate for priesthood.  If the truth of that bottom line doesn’t force us to listen, at least the present crisis should. That’s the crisis of a dying priesthood. With a dying priesthood dies Eucharistic life. They keep telling us that the Eucharist is the center of our religion and defines us as Roman Catholics. If that’s true then it is a scandal to merely patch up our crisis of a dying priesthood instead of really fixing it, especially when there’s a way to fix it.  With a dying priesthood die also our parishes. As we speak the Church of the Three Holy Women is about to be connected in some strange way with another holy lady--Old St. Mary’s. It’s a scandal to merely patch up our crisis of dying parishes instead of really fixing it, especially when there’s a way to fix it.

 

Here’s another scandal hot off the press. This past Thursday, June 15th, US bishops, yielding to Vatican pressure, voted to change the wording of many of the prayers that we’ve been using at Mass for more than 35 years, to bring them into greater conformity with the original Latin.  For example, instead of saying, “Lord, I am not worthy to receive you,” in the prayer before Communion, we will now say, “Lord, I am not worthy that you should enter under my roof.” Another example is: the familiar exchange of greetings between priest and congregation: “The Lord be with you/And also with you,” will be replaced by “The Lord be with you/And with your spirit.” The scandal is all the time and money and energy expended on a meeting to fix something that isn’t broken. The scandal is that that’s used as a substitute for the great pain and great courage it would take to fix what is really broken: our priesthood and our parishes. The broken bread held on high at the consecration this morning is not only for the broken Christ but also for the broken priesthood and the broken parishes.

 

Conclusion

Everyone wins

If we would fix what’s really broken everyone would win.  Healthy young men, who want to minister but who also want to marry, would win. Women, too, who can do just as good a job (and also just as bad a job) as men do, would also win.  Those three holy women who had to join a coalition with a funny name would also win. They’d each get back their own individual parish with its own special name, and they’d each have their own priest again. That young priest, who has to pony-back like a circuit judge of the old days to four different churches would win. He’d have help and wouldn’t have to burn himself out before his time. And I, too, would win; I’d be able to retire before I’m ninety.