K.I.S.S

Keep It Simpler Sweetie

 

July 22, 2007, 16th Sunday of Ordinary Time

Genesis 18:1-10    Colossians 1:24-28    Luke 10:38-42

 

To the church in the diaspora[1]

& to the church of the unchurched[2]

 

Alleluia, alleluia.

A reading from the holy Gospel according to Luke.

Glory to you, Lord.

 

As they went on their way Jesus entered a village, and a woman named Martha received him into her house. And she had a sister called Mary who sat at the Lord's feet and listened to his teaching. But Martha was distracted with much serving, and she went to him and said, “Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to serve alone? Tell her then to help me.” But the Lord answered her, “Martha, Martha, you are anxious and troubled about many things; one thing only is necessary. Mary has chosen the better part, and it shall not be taken away from her (Lk 10:38-42).

 

The Gospel of the Lord.

Praise to you, Lord Jesus Christ.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

A preface to the Martha and Mary story

The Martha and Mary story needs a preface. The women in Luke's gospel are almost always voiceless. Except for Mary and Elizabeth in the stories surrounding Jesus' birth (Lk 1:25 & 34), women are seen but not heard. Scholars tell us that in the Martha and Mary story Luke is interested in presenting this new religion to educated readers of the Roman Empire in a non-threatening and acceptable way. He wants to assure them that the new religion does not threaten their patriarchal society — their man’s world. So Luke tends to silence women in his stories and casts them in socially acceptable roles, that is to say, in obedient and passive roles. In the Martha and Mary story Luke has Jesus chiding the loud, visible and active Martha on the one hand, and commending Mary on the other for choosing the better part. That consists in her being passive and quiet--in her being seen and not heard. 

 

Burkas Islamic and Christian

Women being seen and not heard is, of course, the history of the human race.  It reaches an incredible peak or rather sinks down to an abysmal depth when a culture imposes burkas upon its women. (A burka is a loose enveloping garment that covers a woman’s face and body and is worn in public by certain Muslim women.) With the burka women are not only not heard, but now they are not even seen!  They are non-existent! Theologian Sr. Joan Chittister, wittingly or unwittingly, alludes to Christian burkas (!) which make Christian women invisible when she complains that, “the church is riddled with inconsistencies, is closed to a discussion about those inconsistencies and is sympathetic only to invisible women.”

 

A story to like or dislike

Those who search the scriptures in vain for proof against the ordination of women might like this story which commends Mary for knowing her place and for being satisfied with her role of passivity, silence and invisibility. On the other hand there are some women, perhaps many, who dislike this passage because they think that Martha (the active one, the giving one, the loud one, the visible one) is being treated unfairly by Jesus. In reality it is not Jesus who is mistreating Martha but rather the Jesus seen through the eyes of the gospel writer Luke. He wants to reassure the man’s world of his day that the new religion is no threat to it. He wants to assure it that the new religion will keep women in their place and won’t rock its boat.

 

A traditional interpretation

Contemplation is better than action

With that preface out of the way, we can get on with the story itself. Martha is out in the kitchen cooking up a storm, and Mary is in the parlor sitting with others (mostly men) at the feet of Jesus and drinking in his words. Martha needs help and grows angry by the minute, so she breaks into the parlor and with undisguised agitation says to Jesus, “Doesn’t it bother you that my sister has left me to do all the work? Tell her to get into the kitchen where she belongs and help me.”  Instead of chiding Mary, Jesus turns the tables and chides Martha. “Martha, Martha, you are anxious and troubled about many things; one thing only is necessary. Mary has chosen the better part and it shall not be taken away from her."  

 

These words of Jesus aren’t very enlightening in themselves.  What, we ask, is that “one thing only” which Jesus tells Martha is necessary?  What, we ask, is that “better part” which Jesus says Mary has chosen, and it won’t be taken from her? 

 

We’re all familiar with the traditional interpretation of the Martha and Mary story. It goes back to Pope St. Gregory the Great  (540-604). Martha is a picture of the active life as she runs this way and that way, trying to fulfill what she thinks are the dictates of hospitality. And she becomes frazzled in the process. Mary, on the other hand, is the model of the contemplative life as she sits quietly at the feet of Jesus drinking in all the words that fall from his lips. In Pope Gregory’s interpretation the contemplative life is baldly declared to be better than the active life. Marys are declared to be better than Marthas!  The cloistered contemplative nuns of Mother Angelica’s group are declared to be automatically better than the sisters of Mother Theresa’s group  who go out into the streets of Calcutta and pick up untouchable dying Hindus.  Cloistered Trappist monks are declared to be automatically better than Franciscan friars  serving simple folk in towns and villages. The pope’s interpretation reigned until Vatican II.

 

That council, by its various pronouncements, laid to rest the bald statement that Marys are better than Marthas.  The contemplative life isn’t better than the active life. Those who sit and contemplate must eventually rise up to serve.  Those who run here and there to serve, if they are to be of any good to themselves and others, must eventually sit down and contemplate.  The Martha and Mary story is not a message to contemplatives that they are better than others. It is a message to all God’s people about the tension in their lives — the tension between the Martha and Mary that rages within them – the tension between running around on the one hand and coming to rest on the other in order to make sense out of one’s running around -- the tension between making a living and making sense out of one’s living.

 

A quaint interpretation

A simpler life is better than a fussed up life

The words of the Lord to Martha, we said, aren’t very enlightening. What, we ask, is that “one thing only” which Jesus tells Martha is necessary?  What, we ask, is that “better part” which Jesus says Mary has chosen, and it won’t be taken from her?  Whenever a text isn’t very enlightening, I confer with a big volume with its eight different translations of one and the same passage, side by side for comparison. I read them all, then shake them up in my mind and come up with a cocktail which I think gives me a good taste of what the text is trying to say. In my big volume I found an interpretative translation of the Martha and Mary story which intrigued me with its pedestrian meaning. It gives the story a quaint twist, and it’s quite different from Pope Gregory’s heavy take on the story. It reads,   

 

Now Mary sat on the floor listening to Jesus as he talked. But Martha who was the jittery type was worrying about the big dinner she was preparing. She came to Jesus and said, “Sir, doesn’t it seem unfair to you that my sister just sits here while I do all the work? Tell her to come and help me.”  But the Lord said to her, “Martha, dear friend, you are so upset over all these details! There is only one thing to be concerned about. Mary has discovered it—and I won’t take it away from her! (Living Bible translation).

 

An even quainter translation reads, “Martha, Martha you are fussing so much in the kitchen preparing so many dishes.  Only one dish (!) is necessary! Mary has chosen not to be fussing around but to sit here and recharge herself, and I am not going to ask her to give that up.”

 

That interpretation is not some lofty statement about the superiority of the contemplative life over the active life. It’s not  academic. It’s very simple and down to earth, and we can all easily identify with it in our very hectic lives. That interpretation answers the question what’s better, preparing  a fussy meal with so many dishes that you are too exhausted and too short of time to be hospitable -- or preparing  a simple meal with just one good dish of baked beans or pasta, so that you have  time to be out there with your guests? At the end of the day, what’s better: a fussed-up life or a simple life?  What’s better:  a complicated life or a life you try to keep as simple as is possible in a very complicated world? 

 

Such a translation is appealing because it resonates with us. For many reasons we are becoming more and more a frazzled society, and much of the frazzle is not of our own making. It is placed upon us by the tempo and  technology of the times. But we must take responsibility for that part of the frazzle over which we have power, and we must make a choice between a fussed-up life and a simple one, between a frazzled life and a refreshed and replenished life. 

 

Toward the end of Camus’ novel The Plague, two of the characters who are frazzled from spending days and nights fighting the plague, running around serving one dying victim after the other, decide to take an hour off for friendship.  After sharing stories of their lives and a brief swim in the ocean, one of the characters says to the other, “Of course we must care for the victims, but if we don’t take time out for friendship we will forget why we are fighting the plague in the first place.” They were taking responsibility for that share of the frazzle which was theirs, and they found the time to take a refreshing swim in the ocean. That, in a very convoluted way, was contemplation for the both of them. If Martha, too, would take responsibility for her share of the frazzle within her, she would find time to refresh and replenish herself with Mary at the feet of Jesus.

 

Conclusion

K.I.S.S

The simple life is better than the fussed-up life. We really can’t make life simple anymore. All we can do is make it simpler. When Martha came storming in to the room, Jesus said to her, “Martha, Martha, K.I.S.S! Keep it simpler, Sweetie.” He says the same to us.



[1] Diaspora is a Greek word meaning dispersion. Originally it referred to the settling of scattered colonies of Jews outside Palestine after the Babylonian exile. It’s now come to mean the migration or scattering of a people away from an established or ancestral homeland or parish!

[2] By “the unchurched” is especially meant not those who have left the church but those whom the church has left!