(Mt 16:13-23).

A Team Supreme

 

Introduction

Right and real answers

When Jesus asks the apostles the big question about himself, he doesn’t ask, “Who am I,” but rather “Who do the people say that I am.”  He’s not looking for a right answer.  He’s looking for real answers from real people. When it’s a matter of a right answer, there can only be one, for truth, they say, is not relative. When it’s a matter of real answers, however, there can be as many real answers as there are real people. Had Jesus asked the apostles, “Who am I,” he might have had the one right answer about himself up his sleeve which he was intending to spring on them. We all have asked such a question when we really don’t want to receive an answer because we already have the answer, but we simply want to give the answer we already have.

 

When Jesus, however, asks the apostles, “Who do the people say that I am,” he doesn’t have the one right answer up his sleeve which he intends to give them. He simply and honestly wants to receive real answers from real people.  In fact, he receives four real answers about himself: "Some think you are John the Baptist, some think you are Elijah, still others say you are Jeremiah or one of the prophets” (Mt 16:13-14). None of the answers is wrong and none is right.  They are all simply real answers, and, as such they’re all true.

The right answer

Then Jesus directs a second question to the apostles: “Who do you say that I am?”  He is still looking for real answers. Speaking in behalf of the others, Simon declares, "You are the Christ (the Anointed One), the Messiah, the Son of the living God" (Mt 16:16).  Now that’s a real answer from a real character, Simon, a fisherman. But it happens also to be the right answer which pleases Jesus, and he rewards Simon. He calls him blessed because God revealed the answer to him.  Then he changes Simon’s name to Peter (Petros in Greek, which means “rock”) and makes him the rock upon which he will build his church (Mt 16: 17-18).

 

But immediately after Peter’s wonderful right answer, Jesus begins to speak openly to his apostles saying, “I must go to Jerusalem and suffer greatly from the elders, the chief priests, and the scribes, and be killed and on the third day rise” (Mt. 16:21). At that Peter takes Jesus off to the side and whispers in his ear, "Perish the thought, Lord, that you should have to suffer” (Mt 16:22)!  It’s almost a rebuke. Then Jesus, who just moments before called Simon blessed, calls him Satan, and now it is Jesus who is rebuking Peter saying, “Get behind me, Satan! Shame on you, Peter, for thinking human thoughts and not the thoughts of God!  Shame on you for not knowing that Isaiah prophesied that the Messiah must suffer" (Mt 16:23; Is 52:13-53)!  The first pope has the right answer but he doesn’t know what it means! 

 

The super-right answer

Three hundred years later in the Council of Nicaea (325), the church came up with an even more right answer to who is Jesus of Nazareth.  In the old days we used to sing the answer in Latin at the creed. Jesus is Deum verum de Deo vero, (“true God from true God”). He is Lumen de Lumine (“Light from Light”).  He is genitum non factum (“begotten not made”). He is consubstantialem Patri (“consubstantial with the Father”).  You can’t get a righter answer than that. But whether we sing it in Latin or recite it in English, at the end of the day, we really don’t know what the words mean.  At most we simply suspect they claim an extraordinary uniqueness for the son born of Mary.   

 

Many real answers

When Jesus asks the apostles who do the people say he is, he gets four real answers. But there are many more than just four real answers to the Jesus question. There are as many real answers as there are real people.  If you ask a woman or a gay person or a black man who is Jesus of Nazareth, the answer will be: he is liberator and freedom fighter.  If you ask a social activist who Jesus is, with Dietrich Bonhoeffer he will answer: he is “a man for other people.” If you ask a staunch fundamentalist Christian who is Jesus he will answer: he is the only way without whom there is no salvation.  If you ask a good Lutheran who Jesus is, he will answer with the battle hymn of the Reformation: he is the one who saves us through grace--through his shed blood, not through good works. If you ask a good Catholic who is Jesus, he will answer: he now is his mystical body, the church, whose head is Peter.

My real answer

If you ask me who is Jesus of Nazareth, my answer won’t be that very right answer from the Council of Nicea: “True God from true God, Light from Light, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father.” I’m not quite sure what that means. For me Jesus is the one who told us those superb parables about the human journey. That powerful parable about a man who, journeying from Jerusalem to Jericho, is waylaid by robbers and left half-dead, is passed over by a Jewish priest and Levite, but is shown mercy by a Samaritan (Lk 10:25-37).  Jesus is the  one who told us that powerful parable about the younger of two sons who grabs his share of the inheritance and journeys off to a foreign land where he squanders his money on extravagant living and prostitutes, and then returns to his senses and journeys back to the house of his father, who receives him with open arms, covers his naked body with a fine robe, puts a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet, and holds a banquet to celebrate a son who was lost but now is found ((Lk 15: 11-32).  

 

Again, for me Jesus of Nazareth is also the one who prioritized and simplified religion, when he scolded the Pharisees and teachers of the Law for being picky about ceremonials like the proper washing of pots, pans, and copper kettles, all-the-while neglecting the weightier matters of the law, like justice, compassion and honesty” (Mk 7: 4; Mt 23: 23). Again, for me Jesus of Nazareth is the one who prioritized and simplified religion when he told a  Pharisee, who was confused by the maze of 613 major commandments of Mosaic Law, that the one most important commandment of all is to love the Lord God with your whole heart, soul, mind and strength, and that the second most important commandment is to love your neighbor as you love yourself, and that these two commandments cover everything that the Law legislates and the prophets preach ((Mk 12:28-34;  Dt 6:4-9;  Lv 19:18).

 

Again, for me Jesus of Nazareth is the one who died on the cross not because God was angry at the human race for the sins of the first two human beings and nHHheeded the shed blood of someone from the same human race to appease him. No. For me Jesus is the one who died on the cross because human beings were angry at him because he believed that religion was worthwhile enough to be taken to task. He took the religious leaders of his day to task, and that made them angry, and they crucified him for it. They, not the Father in heaven, killed Jesus (cf. Mt 23:13-27).

 

That’s my answer to the Jesus question. It is not the one from the Nicene creed: “true God from true God, Light from Light, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father.” That, indeed, might be the one right answer to the Jesus question, but I really don’t know what it means. My answer is a real one. I know what it means, and I cherish its meaning.

 

The mischief of Christianity

Mischief can often lurk in the one right answer.  Judaism, Christianity and Islam--each has its own one right answer to the God question, and each has worked terrible mischief because of it.  In the bloody crusades of the 11th and 12th centuries, Christians persecuted the Islamic world for not having the one right answer about Jesus of Nazareth. Down through the centuries Christian Rome persecuted the Jewish community in that city for not having the one right answer about Jesus of Nazareth. Christian anti-Semitism wrote such ugly pages of Catholic Church history, especially in the city of Rome, that Pope John Paul II in April of 1986 entered Rome’s  chief synagogue and there confessed the sins of his church and asked for forgiveness. That was the very first time in 2000 years that a pope entered a synagogue, and some very staunch fundamentalist Christians condemned the Pope for entering into the “den of Satan”-- their characterization of the synagogue.

 

This past Friday, at five in the morning on live TV, I saw a pope for a second time in history enter into a synagogue.  At this moment German Pope Benedict XVI is in Cologne, Germany, for the celebration of World Youth Day 2005. It’s his first trip abroad as pope.  On that occasion he wanted to make a clear statement to the Jewish community of Cologne whose synagogue the Nazis burned down on the night of Nov. 9, 1938.  That’s the infamous night when the Nazis went rampaging through all of Germany (the birthplace of Luther’s Reformation), and in one night destroyed 7000 Jewish businesses and burned down 191 synagogues, the synagogue of Cologne included. That night has come to be called the Krystallnacht, the Night of the Shattered Glass. It marks the beginning, in earnest, of the Holocaust

 

It was an impressive sight to see Pope Benedict enter into the rebuilt Noonstrasse Synagogue of Cologne.  At this present moment, it is a huge gulp of fresh air to see factions solving their differences not with suicide bombings but with gestures and looks of respect, goodwill, compassion and forgiveness.

 

The mischief of Islam

Today Islam, through the radical Muslims whom it either explicitly or implicitly harbors, matches and even supercedes Christianity with the terrible mischief that lies in its one right answer. That one right answer is encapsulated in what they call Shahada: a one-line personal profession of ardent faith that “Only Allah is God, and Muhammad is his Messenger.” For those radical Muslims that means Islam is the only way, and everyone else is an infidel and must go. That one right answer of the Islamists fired up two 747’s and sent them as weapons of massive destruction crashing into the Twin Towers in the World Trade Center in Lower Manhattan on 9/11, 2001, snuffing out the lives of three thousand innocent infidels with one grand slam in the name of Allah, ushering in a brand new age of human history: the age of terrorism. The mischief of 9/11was mountainous; it contained 20,000 body parts, and it took ten months to haul away 2,000,000 tons of debris.

 

Another open letter

In these days of a new pope and pontiff (builder of bridges) the National Catholic Reporter has been encouraging us to write open letters to Pope Benedict XVI. I write one such letter now.

 

Dear Brother Benedict, the church has told us many times what is the right answer to questions not only about Jesus of Nazareth but also about birth control, divorce and remarriage, open Communion, ordination of women, homosexuality and sexuality in general. On the day of your inauguration as the 264th successor of St. Peter you said in your homily, “My real program of governance is not to do my own will, not to pursue my own ideas [not to listen to myself] but to listen together with the whole Church.”  Bravo, Brother Benedict! Bravo! You see many people feel that church only speaks its own right answers but never listens also to our real answers. We ask that you now make good the promise of your inauguration to listen. I was happy to see you enter the Jewish synagogue of Cologne and happy to see how intently you were listening to the Jewish brethren speaking directly to you. It was so obvious that you were really listening.  

Dear Holy Father, listen now to the people of God and hear their real answers not only about Jesus of Nazareth but also about birth control, divorce and remarriage, open Communion, ordination of women, homosexuality and sexuality in general.

 

Conclusion

A team Supreme

Brother Benedict, it is not a question about who of the two of us shall prevail and win. Rather it is a question of both of us winning. We each need the other. We need your right answers to guide us. They are answers harvested from sincere people who have the time to think and pray. But you, Holy Father, in some strange way, need our real answers to guide you. They are harvested from us who, though we have very little time for anything else but to live real life, have the Holy Spirit of our baptism thinking and praying in us and informing our real answers. That’s why you, Holy Father, should listen to us just as we should listen to you. And that, indeed, would make the two of us a team supreme.

 

We are talking about a family problem, for the church is a  family. Parents, make a pact with your kids that you will listen to them, if they will listen to your right answers.  And you kids, make a pact with your parents that you will listen to them if they will listen to your real answers. That, too, would make the two of you a team supreme.