Three Creeds

 

Introduction

4 real answers

When Jesus asked his disciples who do people say that I am, he wasn’t looking for one right answer. He was looking for real answers from real people. He received  four real answers.  "Some say you are John the Baptist, others say you are Elijah or Jeremiah, and still others say you are one of the prophets" (Mk 8: 27-30; Mt 16:13-14). Four real answers from four real people, and none of them is wrong and none is right.  They’re all simply real answers, and, as such they’re all true.

 

There are more than just 4 real answers to the Jesus question. If you ask a staunch fundamentalist Christian who is Jesus, he will answer he is “the only way” without whom there is no salvation.  If you ask a good Lutheran who is Jesus, he will answer with the battle cry of the Reformation that he is the one who save us through “amazing grace” and not good works. If you ask a good Catholic who is Jesus, he will answer that he now is his mystical body, the church, whose head is Peter. If you ask a social activist who is Jesus, with Dietrich Bonhoeffer he will answer he is “a man for other people.” If you ask a woman or a gay person or an African American who is Jesus of Nazareth, he will answer that he is “liberator and freedom fighter.”

 

1 right answer

After asking  who do people say that I am, Jesus looked squarely at the apostles and asked, “Who do you say that I am?”  He was still looking for real answers from real people. Speaking for the others, Simon declared, "You are the Christ, the Anointed One, the Son of the living God" (Mt 16:16).  Now that was not only a very real answer coming from a very  real fisherman, it was also a very right answer. Because of it Jesus called Simon blessed and reminded him that a divine revelation revealed that answer to him. Then Jesus changed Simon’s name to Peter (meaning rock) making him the rock-foundation and first pope upon whom Jesus would build his church (Mt 16: 17-18).

 

The super-right answer

Three hundred years later in the Council of Nicea (325), the church formulated an even more right answer to the Jesus question.  We recite it in the Nicene Creed. Jesus is Deum verum de Deo vero, (true God from true God). He is Lumen de Lumine (Light from Light).  He is genitum non factum (begotten not made). He is consubstantialem Patri “(consubstantial with the Father).  You can’t get a righter answer than that, but whether we sing it in Latin or recite it in English, at the end of the day most of us really don’t know what the words mean. At best we suspect they claim a very extraordinary uniqueness for the son born of Mary.  

 

Dominus Iesus and the one right answer

On August 6, 2000 Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued a 36-page document entitled Dominus Iesus (Latin for Jesus the Lord).  It warned Catholics not to water down the very extraordinary uniqueness of Jesus when dealing with Buddhism and Hinduism. In dialoguing with non-Catholic Christian churches, the document also warned us not to water down the extraordinary uniqueness of the Catholic Church. The document was heavy with ponderous theology. It was disheartening for ecumenists who for thirty years were laboriously building bridges.  At times it was arrogant and condescending in remarks like, “Though non-Catholic churches suffer from defects, they by no means have been deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation.”

 

One  arrogant Catholic gentlemen responding to Dominus Iesus said, “The ultimate goal of dialogue among the various Christian religions is to eventually bring these people back into the Catholic Church. Three cheers to Pope John Paul II for having the courage to say it.”  In the same vein another  Catholic said, “With Dominus Iesus the cafeteria is closed! No more picking and choosing. All religions are not created equal.” Period! On the other hand, however, an angry Catholic gentleman responding to the same Vatican document said, “As an American Catholic, I want to apologize to my non-Catholic friends and acquaintances for the arrogance of my church toward them.”

 

The answer given by that document to the question who is Jesus of Nazareth and where is his true church might well be the one only right answer. But what’s the use of having a right answer if it’s too ponderous to understand, or  if it tears down bridges laboriously built, or if it angers people with its arrogance and condescension. 

 

Relativism/triumphalism

It is noteworthy that Judaism does not claim to have the one only right answer. The Talmud, for example, says that all righteous people of the monotheistic religions, who observe the basic laws of morality, are saved. That’s called the relativist approach to religion; it says, “I have my faith, you have your faith, and others have their faith.” On the other hand, Christianity and Islam each claims that it has the one only right answer.  That’s called the triumphalist approach to religion. Bernard  Lewis says that that approach has Christianity and Islam shouting at each other, “I’m right, you’re wrong, go to hell.” He admits, however, that the triumphalist approach is increasingly under attack in Christendom and is rejected now by many Christian clergymen. But he adds there is very little sign that anything like that is happening in Islam.

 

Islamic terrorists are afoot today, preoccupying us 24/7 and robbing our lives of any sense of normalcy. With their one only right answer that “Only Allah is God, and Muhammad is his Messenger” they shout at us infidels, “We’re right, you’re wrong and we’re going to send you to hell again and again, just as we did on 9/11.”

 

Benedict’s quote

Yes, Christians, too, have been terrorists. So in the year 2000 Pope John Paul apologized to Muslims for the violence committed against them in the name of Christianity. However, on the day Pope Benedict was installed, he greeted fellow Catholics, other Christians and Jews, but he did not explicitly greet Muslims[1]. Two months later when asked whether he considered Islam a religion of peace, he said, "Certainly there are elements that favor peace.” Then he cryptically added, “It also has other elements." Some believe that with Pope Benedict the era of appeasement under Pope John Paul is over, and that the era of a subtle, discreet, yet firm confrontation with Islam has begun. That brings us to the present moment.

 

Last Tuesday, Sept. 12, 2006,  Benedict gave a lecture in Regensburg University in Germany. It dealt at length with the crisis of faith among Christians and only momentarily with Islam and its relationship with violence. The pope quoted from a medieval text recounting a conversation between a 14th-century Byzantine Christian Emperor and a Persian scholar. This is the quote of the Emperor’s words:  “Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.” That’s the quote which has caused the present tumultuous uproar. Some experts believe that Benedict’s quote indicates he intends to deal more squarely with the Muslim world. Some believe that he increasingly feels that confrontation with radical Islam is a fateful moment in history which demands the Vatican's moral authority. 

   

These days if you turn on TV just for a second, you see whole seas of Muslims up in arms against the Pope over his brief but remarkable remark. Yesterday Turkey's ruling party likened the Pope to Hitler and Mussolini and accused him of reviving the mentality of the Crusades. But German Chancellor Angela Merkel was quoted as saying, ”Whoever criticizes the Pope misunderstood the aim of his speech…. What Benedict XVI emphasized was a decisive and uncompromising renunciation of all forms of violence in the name of religion." One commentator excused the Pope for the furor he caused saying, “Benedict has lived a cloistered life and is not attuned to the political nuances of the world. He should have had someone at his side who was so attuned.”

No miscalculation

It is very interesting to note that Rev. Robert Taft, a specialist in Islamic affairs at Rome's Pontifical Oriental Institute, said it was unlikely that the Pope miscalculated how some Muslims would receive his speech. "The message he’s sending is very, very clear: violence in the name of faith is never acceptable in any religion and that he considers it his duty to challenge Islam and anyone else on this." So far the Pope hasn’t done anything remarkably courageous in his pontificate. This might be it!

 

The Vatican's reply to this din is simply that Benedict did not intend the remark to be offensive. He simply wanted to draw attention to the incompatibility of faith and violence. But Benedict has not apologized and has not taken anything back.

 

We make too much….

Not only Islamic fascists but all of us make too much of the right answer. Immediately after Peter’s one very right answer, "You are the Christ, the Anointed One, the Son of the living God," Jesus speaks openly to his apostles about his imminent sufferings. “I must go to Jerusalem and suffer greatly from the elders, the chief priests, and the scribes, and be killed and on the third day rise.” At that,  Peter takes Jesus off to the side and rebukes him saying,  "Perish the thought, Lord, that you should have to suffer!” Then  Jesus, who moments before called Simon blessed, now rebukes Peter and calls him Satan. “Get behind me, Satan! Shame on you, Peter, for thinking human thoughts and not the thoughts of God!  Shame on you for not knowing that Isaiah prophesied that the Messiah must suffer" (Mt 16: 21-23; Is 52:13-53)!  The first pope has the right answer but he doesn’t know what it means!

 

We make too much of the right answer. From Peter's great confession "You are the Christ, the Anointed One, the Son of the living God" right down to the present day, Christians have always had the right answer about Jesus of Nazareth, but we haven’t always understood what it means. We painfully remember that the Holocaust which turned six million Jews into burnt offerings in the crematories of Auschwitz and Buchenwald was perpetrated by people baptized in a  church whose very orthodox creed professed that Jesus of Nazareth “is true God of true God, begotten not made, consubstantial  with the Father.” Lewis reminds us that “Hitler and the Nazis are the products of Christendom.” You can have the answer about Jesus down right but still be dead wrong six million times over.

 

We make too much of the right answer.  “If a brother or sister has nothing to wear and has no food for the day, and one of you says to them, ‘Go in peace, keep warm, and eat well,’ but do not give them the necessities of the body, what good is” your one right answer about Jesus (James 2:14-18)?

 

We make too much of the right answer. Some answers, which were right for centuries, can all of a sudden go wrong on us. We Catholics are experts in this matter. After Vatican II we now find out that we can miss Mass on Sunday and still go to heaven, and that we can eat meat on Friday and still go to heaven.  After Vatican II  many Catholics now believe that all at once right answers about artificial birth control, divorce and remarriage, ordination of women, inter-communion, homosexuality, etc., have all gone wrong.

 

We make too much of the right answer. By clever body language or by not so clever burst of anger we demand the right answer from each other, especially our kids. And they give us the right answer we’re demanding, but it’s often not the truth, and sometimes it’s a lie. We should free each other to be transparent and tell the truth.  Not so much with words but with something more profound, invite the important people in your life to tell you what’s really on their minds and who they really are.  If your son is gay, set him free from telling you a lie. Set him free for telling you the truth. The truth will make you both free.

 

My creed

If Jesus would ask me today, “Alexis, who do you think I am?” I perhaps wouldn’t answer, “You, Lord, are true God from true God, Light from Light, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father.” I don’t always know what that means. Instead I’d answer, “You, Lord, are the one who taught us powerful parables about the human journey. You taught us the parable about  a man who, journeying from Jerusalem to Jericho, was waylaid by robbers and left half-dead, was passed over by a Jewish priest and Levite but was shown compassion by a Samaritan (Lk 10:25-37). You, Lord, are the one who taught us the parable about the younger of two sons who grabbed his share of the inheritance and journeyed off to a foreign land where, after squandering his money and especially himself, he returned to his senses and his father’s house and was received with opened arms” (Lk 15: 11-32).  I know what that means, and I cherish it.

 

If Jesus would ask me today, “Alexis, who do you think I am,” I’d answer, “You Lord are the one who prioritized and simplified religion for me, when you told a  Pharisee, who was confused by the maze of 613 major commandments of Mosaic Law, that the one most important commandment of all is to love the Lord God with whole heart, soul, mind and strength, and that the second most important commandment is to love our neighbor as we love ourselves” (Mk 12:28-34). I know what that means, and I cherish it.

 

If Jesus would ask me today, “Alexis, who do you think I am,” I’d answer, “You Lord are the one who died on the cross not because God was angry over the sin of Adam and Eve and needed shed blood to appease himself, but because HHh human beings were angry at you. It was not God your Father but the religious leaders who were angry at you because you believed your religion was so important that it was worth criticizing with your many `Woes to you Scribes and Pharisees’ (cf. Mt 23:13-27). You took the religious leaders of your day to task, that made them angry, and they crucified you for it.”  I know what that means, and I cherish it.

 

Conclusion

A creed to cherish

In response to the question who is Jesus, there’s an African Creed which says that he is “a man in the flesh, a Jew by tribe, born poor in a little village, who left his home and was always on safari doing good, curing people by the power of God, teaching about God and man, showing that the meaning of religion is love. He was rejected by his people, tortured and nailed hands and feet to a cross and died. He lay buried in the grave, but the hyenas did not touch him, and on the third day he rose from the grave. He ascended to the skies. He is the Lord.” An African can understand what that means, and he can cherish it.

 

That creed in response to the Jesus question, like my own creed, is quite different from the Nicene creed: “true God from true God, Light from Light, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father.” I’m not saying my creed is right and the Nicene creed is wrong. I’m just saying my creed is real to me. I know what it means, and I cherish it.

 

Who do you, Christian, say that Jesus is? Ite Missa est. Go the Mass is ended. Go forth Christian and construct for yourself a creed about Jesus which you can understand with your head and cherish with your heart.

 

 



[1] Pope’s greeting in his homily: “The Church is alive – with these words, I greet with great joy and gratitude all of you gathered here, my venerable brother Cardinals and Bishops, my dear priests, deacons, Church workers, catechists. I greet you, men and women Religious, witnesses of the transfiguring presence of God. I greet you, members of the lay faithful, immersed in the great task of building up the Kingdom of God which spreads throughout the world, in every area of life. With great affection I also greet all those who have been reborn in the sacrament of Baptism but are not yet in full communion with us; and you, my brothers and sisters of the Jewish people, to whom we are joined by a great shared spiritual heritage, one rooted in God’s irrevocable promises. Finally, like a wave gathering force, my thoughts go out to all men and women of today, to believers and non-believers alike.”