Trinity:
A Nifty Attempt to Fathom God
Introduction
The liturgical now
The liturgical cycle
begins with the Father
sending the Son in the Advent-Christmas season. It
continues with Son returning to the Father in the Easter-Ascension season. The
cycle peaks with the Father and the Son sending the Holy Spirit on the feast of Pentecost last Sunday. So today’s feast of the Mystery of the
Trinity is well positioned here at the end of the cycle.
Mystery vs. theology
Mystery in theology has a rich meaning. Mystery is
the more than meets the eye. Mystery is the more than the human mind can fathom.
On the other hand, theology is an attempt of the human mind to fathom God. So
there is Islamic theology: the attempt of Muslims to fathom God. There is
Jewish theology: the attempt of Jews to fathom God. And there is Christian
theology: the attempt of Christians to fathom God. That God is a trinity of persons,
Father, Son and Holy Spirit, is the Christian’s attempt to fathom God.
There’s
an obvious tension between mystery and theology. Mystery says God cannot be fathomed.
On the other hand, theology says, “That might be true, but I’m going to try
anyway.” In the thirteenth century St.
Thomas Aquinas, the church’s most renowned theologian, tried to fathom God. He
wrote volume after volume of theology. But at the sunset of his life he looked
upon the pretentiousness of his extensive volumes and exclaimed in Latin, of
course, “Nihil est!" It‘s nothing! Though God can’t be fathomed, the renowned
Protestant theologian Karl Barth thought he’d try too. Barth proceeded to write volume after volume
about the ineffable God. And he, too, at the sunset of his life made sport of
his pretentiousness saying, "The angels are laughing at old Karl
Barth."
Mystery
destroyers
Though we can’t fathom God, we claim to do so every time we have
got God down pat. When, for example, we
know that God certainly prefers Christians over Jews and Muslims, then we’ve
got God down pat, and then we destroy the mystery of God. When we know for sure
what God thinks about all the great issues which wrangle the church, like birth
control, divorce and remarriage, homosexuality and open Communion, then we’ve
got God down pat, and then we destroy the mystery of God. When we know that
sexual purity is God’s greatest moral delight even before justice and peace,
and that he concocts AIDS to get even with immoral sinners (but does almost
nothing special to get even with corporate crooks), then we’ve got God down pat,
and we destroy the mystery of God. When we know God’s sexual preferences (i.e.,
male priests over female priests or celibate priests over married priest), when
we even know God’s gender (i.e., he’s obviously a male) then we’ve got God down
pat, and then we destroy the mystery of God. When we even know God’s exclusive recipe
for making a valid Communion wafer (i.e., it’s got to be wheat and not rice
flour), then, indeed, we’ve got God down pat, and then, indeed, we destroy the
mystery of God. A God whom we’ve got down pat is an obedient God: we have him
obeying us instead of us obeying him.
Usama has God down pat
The world’s most
notorious terrorist, Usama bin Laden,
has his God down pat. Bin Laden is first and foremost an Islamic
theologian whose theology preaches the Five Pillars of Islam, especially the
Pillar of Shahada. That’s a one-line
personal profession of faith which proclaims “there is no God but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet.” That’s the one only right answer
about God, and anyone who doesn’t profess it is an infidel. That pat answer
about God contributed greatly to 9/11. It sent two 747s crashing into the
Rev. Phelps has God down pat
The Rev. Phelps also has
his God down pat, and he, too, is a terrorist. Matt Shepard was a gay student
from the
The church in
Who doesn’t
love doesn’t know God
In his first letter
Who loves knows God (a)
But
John’s words are a two-edged sword. He says, “The one who loves knows God, for
God is love” (I Jn
Who loves knows
God (b)
Some years ago a friend
called me in the middle of the night around
Then at the homily of this remarkable event, which didn’t have God down pat, there came a real shocker. The preacher got up to preach but the preacher wasn’t a he. The preacher was a she: the Rev. Linda Hansen. What’s more about this event which didn’t have God down pat, the preacher, who was born and raised a Catholic, left the Church for various reasons, and she became an ordained Unitarian Universalist minister. Unitarians, you know, don’t subscribe to the Trinity. That issue, however, wasn’t the top priority in Rev. Linda’s life.
She was chosen to be
the homilist for the funeral because of her warm personal relationship with Sr.
Barbara. The homily was carefully crafted, and it softly alluded to the strange
twists and turns of the human journey. Rev. Linda spoke also about the warm,
human side of Sr. Barbara. She mentioned a visit to Linda in the early 1980s in
the
Now
which of these two ladies, Sr. Barbara or Rev. Linda, knew God? They both knew God. Sr. Barbara knew God, not because she was a
Trinitarian, and the Rev. Linda knew
God, not because she was a Unitarian. Both
knew God because they both loved much. Scripture says, “The one who loves,
knows God.”
Look what happens…
Towards the end of the funeral
Mass, despite the fear that it would go on and on, people were invited to come
forth and give testimony to Sr. Barbara. They didn’t go on and on, but they did
give joyful testimony to that great lady. A minister of music at St. Ben’s, not
a Catholic, told about the time when he was on a retreat with Sr. Barbara and
in a reflection session admitted that he found it difficult to express his
emotions. Sr. Barbara chimed in, “You know that’s when you wish you were a dog
with a tail you could wag.” Testimonies like that at an event which didn’t have anything down pat,
made people laugh and rejoice, and it turned a funeral into a celebration which
concluded with a soul-filled soloist singing that powerful Negro spiritual
(which a gung-ho liturgist would frown upon): ”Swing Low, Sweet Chariot,
comin’ for to carry me home.”
Look at what happens when we don’t have God down pat. Look at what happens when we give God all the freedom to do all the things that God can do—to bless all the things God wants to bless. Look at what happens when we don’t have birth and burial and everything else in between down pat: it allows the finest of wines to flow, and it sends us forth, even from a funeral, inebriated with joy.
Conclusion
Trinity:
a nifty attempt to fathom God
Obviously this isn’t a crusade against
theology or creeds or catechisms which have their place and purpose. There are
better things to crusade against. But if, as we recite the creed this morning
with its unequivocal but highly theological profession of the Trinity, and we don’t
know what the words mean, be at peace. As long as we are trying to be loving human beings,
we do, indeed, know God, for “the one who
loves knows God.”
And at the end of the day we Christians can
compliment ourselves: our Trinity is a nifty attempt to fathom God. What Trinity
wants to say is that God is love, but for loving you need more than one. So in
God, who is never alone or lonely, there is a family of Father, Son and Holy
Spirit, and they’re all loving one another. And what’s more, that God who is in
loving exchange within himself extends an invitation outward to us to join him
in his family of love.