Appellate Opinions Released December 30, 2005
The Court of Appeals released these opinions today (none were recommended for publication).
The Stalwart
weblog of the
Milwaukee Lawyers Chapter
The Federalist Society
Amendment of Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19 on Briefs and appendix, relating to the certification of compliance with Wis. Stat. (Rule) 809.19(2)
State Bar of Wisconsin members are invited to join a delegation from the Minnesota Bar from Feb. 21 - 26. This is the delegation’s third trip to Cuba, to meet with lawyers, judges, members of the National Assembly, ambassadors, and observe court appearances. The trip is arranged through the Minnesota Bar Association’s Civil Litigation Governing Council.
Update: The Rake had a photo from a recent trip.
By the time his trial began in January 1873, he had been indicted on seven felony charges of larceny and forgery, although in the end he was never tried on any of them. The prosecution decided its most provable case was a 220-count misdemeanor indictment issued in October 1872 for failing to audit claims against the city. The trial ended in a hung jury, but Tweed was convicted of 204 counts at a retrial in November 1873. Although a misdemeanor carried a maximum penalty of one year in prison, Judge Noah Davis sentenced him to consecutive terms for groups of the charges, adding up to 13 years in prison, plus $12,500 in fines.
The Court of Appeals, ruling this punishment excessive, unanimously ordered Tweed's release after a year in prison. He was immediately rearrested on a $6 million civil suit brought by the state and placed in jail on $3 million bail. Before he could be tried, he escaped, disappearing for ten months until a U.S. State Department official recognized him in Cuba. He then fled to Spain but was captured as soon as he arrived (lacking a photo, U.S. officials sent a Nast cartoon to identify him) and extradited. Convicted on the civil charge in his absence, he died of heart disease in 1878 in debtors' prison.
Nestler's application for a restraining order was accompanied by a six-page typed letter in which she said Letterman used code words, gestures and "eye expressions" to convey his desires for her.
She wrote that she began sending Letterman "thoughts of love" after his "Late Show" began in 1993, and that he responded in code words and gestures, asking her to come East.
She said he asked her to be his wife during a televised "teaser" for his show by saying, "Marry me, Oprah." Her letter said Oprah was the first of many code names for her and that the coded vocabulary increased and changed with time.
Wisconsin Court of Appeals opinions
including recommended for publication:
Waite v. Easton-White Creek Lions, Inc. on whether typed initials constitute subscription (signing) by a party's attorney on a settlement agreement
Marotz v. Hallman on reducing underinsured motorists coverage by amounts received from an additional driver who is not underinsured
Switzer v. Switzer on extension of a domestic abuse injunction
been state director of Howard Dean's Wisconsin campaign and a top official in America Coming Together in the state. He also recently ran Joe Wineke's winning campaign for Democratic Party chairman.
Mayers: Do you have an alternative amendment or proposal or do you think the law should just stay the way things are?
Tate: I don't think that Wisconsin voters think that we should ban civil unions, domestic partnership benefits ...
Mayers: But there's not civil unions ...
Tate: No there's not. But this amendment would prevent that from ever happening. ...
Mayers: Is this about instituting civil unions like in Vermont?
Tate: No.
Mayers: But you’re sort of holding out that as a possibility, right?
Tate: We're not campaigning for civil unions with this effort. But what we're campaigning for is equality and fairness. ...
"Our government is growing faster than our economy and our incomes. The percentage of take from us is ever-increasing," said Rep. Frank Lasee (R-Bellevue), a sponsor of the legislation, known as TABOR [for Taxpayer Bill of Rights]. "That's why I believe so strongly in TABOR. Limiting growth allows the private sector to have a little more money in our pocket."
"In some ways it's easy to play this sensationally, but there's not much surprising here," said Andrew Reschovsky, professor of public affairs and applied economics at UW-Madison. "Taxes are by their very nature cyclical. We had a recession and that led to big reductions in state tax revenues. It's taken four years almost to come out of that."
The report states that total taxes claimed 32% of personal income in 2005, up from 30.6% the prior year. Nonetheless, taxes as a share of income in 2005 were the fifth-lowest in a ranking of all the years in the 1980-2005 period, the study says. The lowest was 30.5% in 2003, and "taxes relative to personal income remained well below their 2000 peak of 36.7%," according to the study.
"It's not that we shouldn't be concerned about it. At 32%, we're still among highest-taxed in the country," Knapp [Dale Knapp, research director of the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance] said.
Was it constitutional? Did it violate federal statutory law? It turns out these are hard questions, but I wanted to try my best to answer them. ...
Wisconsin Court of Appeals opinions
(none recommended for publication)
In 1988, as revealed by a file in the papers of the late Justice Thurgood Marshall, a group of law clerks petitioned Rehnquist citing their "concern about the Court's celebration of Christmas."
The clerks objected to the Christmas tree itself, as well as the Christmas party where Christmas carols are sung. Noting that "some of us do not object at all to these observances," the clerks said that "all of us are concerned that members of the public, as well as Court employees, may be offended by them." The clerks requested a meeting with Rehnquist to discuss the matter.
Marshall's papers indicated no reply from Rehnquist, but the party proceeded as it has every year since. As he apparently did every year, Marshall sent a note to Rehnquist declining the invitation: "As usual, I will not participate. I still prefer to keep church and state apart."
But Rehnquist died in September, and there was some suspense about whether his successor, John Roberts Jr., would tinker with the tone or content of the party. As far as could be determined in advance, Roberts has apparently taken the "stare decisis" approach, following the precedent set by his predecessor.
Reinhold Niebuhr, who described himself as a "Christian realist," makes a similar point in analyzing America's entry into World War I. Rejecting critics who charged that "making the world safe for democracy" was "moral cant," Niebuhr wrote: "For the fact is that every nation is caught in the moral paradox of refusing to go to war unless it can be proved that the national interest is imperiled, and of continuing in the war only by proving that something much more than national interest is at stake."
Its representive was among those testifying against the proposed advisory referendum on reinstating the death penalty.
It does not appear that SJR 5 will move forward at this time.
Prior to the trial, Polanski had gotten around a major obstacle. If he sued in the U.S. and showed up in person, he would likely be arrested for a crime committed more than a quarter of a century before. If he sued in the U.K. and showed up in person, he would run the risk of extradition back to the United States. Polanski's lawyers argued that for him to get a fair hearing he should be allowed to fight his case in the U.K. from the safety of France. The House of Lords, in a landmark decision, by a majority of three to two, overruled the Court of Appeal, which had unanimously ruled against Polanski's being allowed to give his evidence from France.
This story, based on the rhythms of the familiar House That Jack Built, traces the creation and uses of crack cocaine from its beginnings on the plantation to its consumption in the inner city.
Without doubt Fisk is an honest man by his lights, but then plain dishonesty is not the only danger for journalism. Another correspondent on Fisk's own paper who had reported from the Balkans in the 1990's looked back with distaste at "the angry partisanship" with which that conflict was covered. The phrase could almost be Fisk's heraldic motto.
For several decades the philosophical ground has been softened up by the relativism and political correctness of the secular left, which succeeded in undermining the very idea of objective reality and of calling a spade a spade--so now, in the resulting marsh, fantasies like intelligent design (or Scientology or feng shui or 9/11 as a CIA plot) take root and spread like weeds. Liberals pioneered squishy-minded indulgence of their key constituencies' unfortunate new ideas, like reparations and criminalized hate speech; now it's the right's turn.
(via DRI)