Appellate Decisions Released April 25, 2006
The Wisconsin Supreme Court did not release any opinions or dispositional orders today.
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals released these opinions today, of which the following were recommended for publication:
State v. T. P. Trucking, holding that woodchips do not constitute "peeled or unpeeled forest products cut crosswise" for purposes of determining whether a truck was exempt from weight limits under the frozen roads provision of Wis. Stat. sec. 348.175. If you need to know this information, you will understand this post.
Kolupar v. Wild Pontiac Cadillac, Inc., holding that "costs," as that term is used in Wis. Stat. sec. 218.0163(2) (relating to recoveries against automobile dealers for fraud) means "taxable costs," not "actual costs."
Onapolis v. State, ruling there was no violation of the Rule of Specialty (incorporated in the United States/Australia Extradition Treaty) when Onapolis was convicted of violating his conditions of parole, which parole was related to the crime for which he was extradited.
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals released these opinions today, of which the following were recommended for publication:
State v. T. P. Trucking, holding that woodchips do not constitute "peeled or unpeeled forest products cut crosswise" for purposes of determining whether a truck was exempt from weight limits under the frozen roads provision of Wis. Stat. sec. 348.175. If you need to know this information, you will understand this post.
Kolupar v. Wild Pontiac Cadillac, Inc., holding that "costs," as that term is used in Wis. Stat. sec. 218.0163(2) (relating to recoveries against automobile dealers for fraud) means "taxable costs," not "actual costs."
Onapolis v. State, ruling there was no violation of the Rule of Specialty (incorporated in the United States/Australia Extradition Treaty) when Onapolis was convicted of violating his conditions of parole, which parole was related to the crime for which he was extradited.
posted by Daniel Kelly at 11:59 AM
<< Home