Book Reviews
(via First Things)
Additional reviews at Wisconsin Lawyer
The Stalwart
weblog of the
Milwaukee Lawyers Chapter
The Federalist Society
The case of the month project provides high school teachers with some of the necessary tools to educate their students about the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Each month, during the Supreme Court's session, a "teachable" case will be highlighted.
This case examines the legality of a traffic stop, and whether there was reasonable suspicion to investigate when an officer observed a vehicle weaving within its own lane.
The two candidates for state Supreme Court will debate at 7 p.m. March 19 at Marquette University Law School. ...
The debate will be broadcast on Time Warner's Wisconsin on Demand Channel 1111.
Seating is limited. If you want to attend, call the Journal Sentinel at (414) 224-2400 or send an e-mail to editor@journalsentinel.com.
WisPolitics.com, the Wisconsin State Journal, the Wisconsin Radio Network, and the Wisconsin Law Journal will co-sponsor a post-primary debate between the final two candidates for Supreme Court on Friday, March 9 at 7:30 p.m. at the State Bar Center, 5302 Eastpark Boulevard in Madison.
FRIDAY, MARCH 2, 2007
09:45 a.m. Wendy S. DeHart, et al. v. Wisconsin Mut. Ins. Co., et al., 05AP2962-FT
10:45 a.m.(?) Joseph Leitinger, et al. v. Van Buren Management, et al., 05AP2030
01:30 p.m. Thomas Avery, et al. v. Drew Diedrich, et al., 05AP1730
02/27/07 at Dist. II, 2727 North Grandview Blvd., Waukesha
9:30 a.m. Racine County v. Int'l Assoc. of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 2006AP964
Azar Named to PSC
Jason Helgerson Appointed Medicaid Director
Other Appointments
Senate Democrats Prevent Vote on “Frankenstein Veto” Bill
Joint Finance to Hold Budget Hearings Around the State
Clifford/Ziegler Advance in Supreme Court Race
Doyle Hip Surgery Successful
Legislative Activity
Senate Democrats Announce Legislative Session Agenda
Senate Republicans Unveil 2007-2008 Agenda
It's time for hasty, irritable justice!
in a 5-4 opinion by Justice Breyer--held that the Due Process Clause does not "permit[] a jury to base [a punitive damages] award in part upon its desire to punish the defendant for harming persons who are not before the court (e.g., victims whom the parties do not represent)."
Last December, the U.W. Law School student body passed a resolution opposing the congressional Solomon Amendment, which requires schools to provide the military with full access to students for recruitment purposes or risk the termination of certain federal funds.
The resolution, passed by three-quarters of the law school's student body...
Law students supported the resolution by a 3 - 1 margin with nearly 300 students casting votes.
Nonresident State Bar members are Bar members, too - deserving of proportional representation and CLE comity.
State v. Circuit Court for Monroe County (court can assess jury fees under Wis. Stat. §814.51 against State for canceled trial)
State v. Cox (harmless error when court failed to instruct the jury that, of two counts submitted for deliberation, one was lesser included of the other; jury returned guilty verdict on both counts, so the court struck the verdict on the lesser).
The Wisconsin Criminal Justice Study Commission has released its first report [6 pp. pdf] related to the DNA testing backlog at the State Crime Laboratory.
[Former Chief Justice Nathan] Heffernan, who joined the Supreme Court in 1964, recalled that Fairchild always dressed very conservatively, in dark blue and black garb. When Heffernan asked Fairchild about his apparel, Fairchild responded, "You can get by with a hell of a lot of liberalism if you dress conservative enough."
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge John Shabaz will hear arguments from the anti-abortion rights group and an attorney representing two state agencies. They'll fight over whether Wisconsin's Supreme Court rules limiting the speech of judicial candidates should be suspended to allow Wisconsin Right to Life to quiz judicial candidates for the upcoming spring elections.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has interpreted its rules to say that "a judge or candidate for judicial office may not, while a proceeding is pending or impending ... make any public comment that may reasonably be viewed as committing the judge, judge-elect or candidate to a particular case outcome."
Because of the rules, the group said in its suit, it was unable to use its survey in 2006 because six of seven judicial candidates questioned declined to give their views.
As we enter a new two-year budget cycle and legislative session, the Director of State Courts Office will be taking a more proactive approach.
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2007
09:45 a.m. State v. Thomas S. Mayo, 04AP1592-CR
10:45 a.m. State v. Bobby G., 06AP66-NM
01:30 p.m. Steven J. Wickenhauser, et al. v. Jack Lehtinen, et al., 04AP2681
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2007
09:45 a.m. State v. Jeffrey Townsend, 03AP429-CR
10:45 a.m. State v. William F. Schweda, et al., 05AP1507
01:30 p.m. State v. Robert E. Post, 05AP2778-CR
02/13/07 at Dist. II, 2727 North Grandview Blvd., Waukesha
9:30 a.m. Emmpak Foods, Inc. v. LIRC, 2006AP729
ABA Considers Recommendations on Judicial Conduct, Gun Control, & "Apology Legislation" at Mid-Year Meeting, Page 1
Michael Wallace Speaks with the Federalist Society, Page 1
ABA Partners with Diverse Coalition In Seeking Reforms to Thompson Memo, Page 2
Department of Education Review ABA Law School Accreditation Standards, Page 3
National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Seeks Participation in ABA Labor Conference, Page 6
ABA President Criticizes Charles Stimon’s Remarks about Guantanamo Lawyers, Page 7
ABA Testimony in Michael Wallace Nomination, Page 8
ABA President William Neukom Speaks to The Federalist Society